Re: Highly bred Hackers: Wallowing in enlightenment (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)

Hey folks, please take note:
 "Rust is the last programming language made for humans
that we'll need. Future languages will be optimized for
machines, where AI handles all the coding"
https://twitter.com/nath_simard/status/1816147809608851830
 Sounds like utter bullshit to me. Must be a
stupid AI, that cannot do the safety precautions
of Rust. Why would I need rust, if I have an AI?
 For this exampe, the AI might generate:
 #include <stdio.h>
 int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    printf("Hello %s\n", argv[0]);
}
 Which might indeed generate a segfault. In
case there are zero arguments, argv[0] might
hafe the value NULL.
https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/urz/archiv/kursunterlagen/C/kap3/argmain.htm
 So why blame the target language, and not the AI?
This is a red herring argument in favor of Rust.
 Mild Shock schrieb:

Just reading:
>
"Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
or computer model of nature, and see
the Earth as a living organism, which
should be treated and understood accordingly"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources
>
Now that we enter the age of AI. What
about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
Computer model? Any pointers?