Re: will trump have the balls....

On 11/29/2024 10:58 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:21:35 +0000, wugi wrote:
>

Op 29/11/2024 om 13:11 schreef Jim Pennino:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:41:39 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>

...to say that relativity and quantum are bollocks?

>
Very much doubt that, at the moment. If any politician could say

>
Only delusionally insane crackpots think that what a politician says
is relevant.

>
Again, some politicians like Trump thrive on crackpottery, so he could
gladly adhere to such statements.

>
So long as the e=mcc frauds are defunded. What can be better!

>
You mean frauds like the world wide GNSS system that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 30 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like nuclear reactors that have been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 80 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like radar systems that have been working exactly
as predicted by conventional physics for over 120 years now, crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the cathode ray tube that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 125 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the electric generator that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 190 years now,
crackpot?
>
>

And Faraday's fraud "magnetizing the light"?
And Casimir, Cerenkov, and Compton? Coriolis?
How about Lense-Thirring? Various cliff-side tests of gravity?
Allais effect?
The ephemeris is called "Parameterized Post-Newtonian",
not "rubber-sheet".
Muon decay? Bell and Aspect-type experiments?
How about dark matter and dark energy, they've falsified a
theory without them, no?
The mass-energy equivalency and the cosmological constant,
the one being formally rotational and the other vanishing non-zero,
of course are two great super-classical concepts in physics, today.
More balls to bust, about busting balls, ....
Anyways, name any "effect" in physics, the reason it has
that name is because it's extra. Similarly "anomaly",
there are a variety of usual linear, partial derivations.
A variety of usual linear, partial derivations, ...,
"incomplete", at best.
These days Faraday rotation is new again, and, nutation again.
The primary determinant of US GDP since recordkeeping,
is USG R&D. And the biggest waste and fraud are contracted.