Re: will trump have the balls....

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:47:18 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 11/29/2024 10:58 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:21:35 +0000, wugi wrote:
>

Op 29/11/2024 om 13:11 schreef Jim Pennino:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:41:39 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>

...to say that relativity and quantum are bollocks?

>
Very much doubt that, at the moment. If any politician could say

>
Only delusionally insane crackpots think that what a politician says
is relevant.

>
Again, some politicians like Trump thrive on crackpottery, so he could
gladly adhere to such statements.

>
So long as the e=mcc frauds are defunded. What can be better!

>
You mean frauds like the world wide GNSS system that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 30 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like nuclear reactors that have been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 80 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like radar systems that have been working exactly
as predicted by conventional physics for over 120 years now, crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the cathode ray tube that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 125 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the electric generator that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 190 years now,
crackpot?

Fraudulent criminal e=mcc babbling pseudo-physicists take the credit
from the brilliant work done by practical engineers following the lead
of honest pre Einsteinian physicists; that is, of the sort
unknown these days; and pretend their rubbish theories created those
advances.

>
>

>
 >
>
And Faraday's fraud "magnetizing the light"?

Huh?

>
And Casimir, Cerenkov, and Compton? Coriolis?
>
How about Lense-Thirring? Various cliff-side tests of gravity?
>
Allais effect?

Surely Arindam's physics that unifies all forces as electrical will
provide far superior and satisfactory explanations for all physics
effects.
All Arindam's words must be read very carefully and his rail gun
experiments recreated in every physics lab.

>
The ephemeris is called "Parameterized Post-Newtonian",
not "rubber-sheet".
>
Muon decay? Bell and Aspect-type experiments?

Let us say anything to do with e=mcc=hv must be immediately rubbished.

>
>
How about dark matter and dark energy, they've falsified a
theory without them, no?

Dark matter is core of stars sans hydrogen cover.

>
>
The mass-energy equivalency and the cosmological constant,
the one being formally rotational and the other vanishing non-zero,
of course are two great super-classical concepts in physics, today.

Bollocks theories, superlative nonsense.

>
>
>
More balls to bust, about busting balls, ....
>
>
>
Anyways, name any "effect" in physics, the reason it has
that name is because it's extra. Similarly "anomaly",
there are a variety of usual linear, partial derivations.

Wrong theories provide unsatisfactory explanationd but scope for
careers.
Telling the truth and then run for your life is not an option for
careerists.

>
>
A variety of usual linear, partial derivations, ...,
"incomplete", at best.
>
>
These days Faraday rotation is new again, and, nutation again.
>
>
>
The primary determinant of US GDP since recordkeeping,
is USG R&D. And the biggest waste and fraud are contracted.