Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 01. Dec 2024, 20:45:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <viiecc$m5on$4@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/1/24 4:37 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
ChatGPT it is  easier to
re-iterate a problem and explore solutions,
you don't get punished for sloppy questions,
That's a blessing as well as a curse.
I have tested chatgpt for it. The problem with chatgpt is that it builds on what you assert as well. If you deliberately keep asserting a false idea, it learns it and eventually complies with it and makes use of it for further processing of the original question's answer! So you can inject its "thought process" with garbage and make it churn out essentially garbage.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Dec 24 * "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))7Mild Shock
1 Dec 24 `* Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))6Physfitfreak
1 Dec 24  `* Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))5Mild Shock
1 Dec 24   +- Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))1Physfitfreak
1 Dec 24   +* Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))2Physfitfreak
1 Dec 24   i`- Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))1Physfitfreak
1 Dec 24   `- Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023))1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal