Re: will trump have the balls....

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 7:43:01 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:47:18 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>

On 11/29/2024 10:58 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:21:35 +0000, wugi wrote:
>

Op 29/11/2024 om 13:11 schreef Jim Pennino:

In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:41:39 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>

...to say that relativity and quantum are bollocks?

>
Very much doubt that, at the moment. If any politician could say

>
Only delusionally insane crackpots think that what a politician says
is relevant.

>
Again, some politicians like Trump thrive on crackpottery, so he could
gladly adhere to such statements.

>
So long as the e=mcc frauds are defunded. What can be better!

>
You mean frauds like the world wide GNSS system that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 30 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like nuclear reactors that have been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 80 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like radar systems that have been working exactly
as predicted by conventional physics for over 120 years now, crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the cathode ray tube that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 125 years now,
crackpot?
>
Or do you mean frauds like the electric generator that has been working
exactly as predicted by conventional physics for over 190 years now,
crackpot?

>
Fraudulent criminal e=mcc babbling pseudo-physicists take the credit
from the brilliant work done by practical engineers following the lead
of honest pre Einsteinian physicists; that is, of the sort
unknown these days; and pretend their rubbish theories created those
advances.

>
>

>
 >
>
And Faraday's fraud "magnetizing the light"?

>
Huh?

>
And Casimir, Cerenkov, and Compton? Coriolis?
>
How about Lense-Thirring? Various cliff-side tests of gravity?
>
Allais effect?

>
Surely Arindam's physics that unifies all forces as electrical will
provide far superior and satisfactory explanations for all physics
effects.
>
All Arindam's words must be read very carefully and his rail gun
experiments recreated in every physics lab.

>
The ephemeris is called "Parameterized Post-Newtonian",
not "rubber-sheet".
>
Muon decay? Bell and Aspect-type experiments?

>
Let us say anything to do with e=mcc=hv must be immediately rubbished.

>
>
How about dark matter and dark energy, they've falsified a
theory without them, no?

>
Dark matter is core of stars sans hydrogen cover.

>
>
The mass-energy equivalency and the cosmological constant,
the one being formally rotational and the other vanishing non-zero,
of course are two great super-classical concepts in physics, today.

>
Bollocks theories, superlative nonsense.

>
>
>
More balls to bust, about busting balls, ....
>
>
>
Anyways, name any "effect" in physics, the reason it has
that name is because it's extra. Similarly "anomaly",
there are a variety of usual linear, partial derivations.

>
Wrong theories provide unsatisfactory explanationd but scope for
careers.
Telling the truth and then run for your life is not an option for
careerists.

>
>
A variety of usual linear, partial derivations, ...,
"incomplete", at best.
>
>
These days Faraday rotation is new again, and, nutation again.
>
>
>
The primary determinant of US GDP since recordkeeping,
is USG R&D. And the biggest waste and fraud are contracted.

Arindam has got a provisional patent from the Australian Govt for only
$100.
The genius makes money; talents waste them.
None with greater talent for wasting money than the Einsteinian talents.
Lucky they have not wasted billions of lives so far with their evil.
Woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor