Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:03:20 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
 

On 12/6/24 19:12, Bertietaylor wrote:

Lousy research skills by Einsteinians on display!

>
For some reason, you edited out everything I said, so it is not on
display.  Maybe you don't really want it to be on display, hmm?

 
It is not necessary to repost what has already been posted. Anyone can
follow a thread to see what was written earlier.

>

True that Arindam's 2013 conference paper was rejected by Europeans but
was accepted by the Chinese, Koreans and the Japanese reviewers. In 2016
Arindam did realise the experiment he had described in the 2013 paper.
However the faculty at RMIT stabbed him in the back. They denied that
Arindam had made a working model of a new design rail gun, and failed
Arindam at his final PhD viva. Arindam then continued entirely on his
own and in 2017 posted online a full set of YouTube videos with complete
details. In later years he made more powerful guns and developed the new
theory, got more powerful capacitors to show inertia violation very
clearly. This proving his new physics started back in 1998.

>
I was responding to the claim that rail guns don't recoil.

 
That is not entirely correct. The claim is that the electromagnetic
force accelerating the armature - under certain conditions - does NOT
have an equal and opposite reaction. Now mechanical force is needed to
launch the projectile upon the rails. That force has a reaction of
course. The recoil seen on videos is the reaction from the mechanical
component.

There is no mechanical force in a railgun, all the force is
electromagnetic, crackpot.

<snip.

But the fun starts after that. The em force accelerates the armature and
to begin with the rolling friction on the rails keep on pushing the gun
back. Had it been sliding this would not happen.

Friction would pull the "gun" forward with the projectile, cracpot.

<snip remaining insane babble>