Sujet : Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physicsDate : 09. Dec 2024, 16:03:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <rfdj2l-c8492.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
bertietaylor <
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Woof-woof, Arindam allowed me to post the background info. about rail
guns in his 2013 seminal paper on the rail gun.
Arindam Banerjee and Dr. P J Radcliffe
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
Abstract—Recent experimental work on model rail guns shows very little
recoil upon the rails for the static case, where the armature or
projectile does not move.
Of course there is no recoil in this case because recoil requires *MOTION*
as in Newton's laws of *MOTION*, crackpot.
It is clear you don't have a clue what Newton's laws mean, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble all based on ignorant nonsense>