Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 09. Dec 2024, 16:59:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <d26caf51fd656da42661cdfb666e3acd@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:03:20 +0000, David Canzi wrote:

>
Anyway, the Japanese and Chinese are making 600km/hr trains,
>
Do these marvelous trains break conservation of momentum?
Let us see how they operate.  Their operation was explained to Arindam
Banerjee by the chief designer of Tokyo Railways in SMART2015
conference, where Arindam chaired a session and that engineer gave a
keynote address showing prototype trains going at 500+ Km/hr.
There is supercooling causing very large superconducting currents on the
sides of the trains, near to the outer "skin". A lot of energy goes into
the supercooling and that is the main energy requirement. Upto 160 Km/hr
the train runs on wheels, normally, but over that it takes off - there
is magnetic levitation. Now how does that happen.
The great engineer explained there were coils in the barriers just
outside the train. As the huge currents passed through these coils, the
magnetic field flux cutting across the coils created a voltage, which in
turn created a current, which had its magnetic field, and that field
acted upon the large current in the train, lifting it off the ground and
also accelerating the train. When Arindam inquired closely, the engineer
readily explained the orientation of the coils in the barriers and
train, making it all happen.
Now, with higher current there will be higher speed and higher lift -
there is no theoretical limit to the speed of the maglev train. The
Chinese are thinking in supersonic terms; only wind resistance is the
block for there is no friction from the rails.
Also, there being levitation, there is no mechanical reaction on the
rails as in ordinary rail and road transport. Pure internal force makes
this marvelous train move, and thus, it follows Arindam's new physics
where the laws of motion are suitably revised taking electricity into
account. The force is applied from the current within, using the
magnetic field induced by it. There will be force applied on the
barriers, from the magnetic field acting on the induced current, but as
the barriers are grounded they will be stable. The acceleration will
thus be continual, just as in any internal force engine.  Yes, that will
completely upset the law of conservation of momentum, as was predicted
by Arindam back in 2000 in his book "To the Stars!" which was written
under Bertie's adoring gaze.
Woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Dec 24 * Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper35David Canzi
6 Dec 24 +* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 i`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 +* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper20Bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i+- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
8 Dec 24 i+* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper12David Canzi
9 Dec 24 ii+* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper10Bertietaylor
9 Dec 24 iii+* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper5Jim Pennino
9 Dec 24 iiii`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper4bertietaylor
9 Dec 24 iiii `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Jim Pennino
10 Dec 24 iiii  `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2Bertietaylor
10 Dec 24 iiii   `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
12 Dec 24 iii`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper4David Canzi
12 Dec 24 iii `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Bertietaylor
12 Dec 24 iii  +- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Bertietaylor
12 Dec 24 iii  `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Bertietaylor
9 Dec 24 ii`- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1bertietaylor
9 Dec 24 i`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper6bertietaylor
9 Dec 24 i `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper5Jim Pennino
10 Dec 24 i  `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper4Bertietaylor
10 Dec 24 i   `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Jim Pennino
11 Dec 24 i    `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2Bertietaylor
11 Dec 24 i     `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 +* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper4Bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 i `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2Bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i  `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 +* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper4bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i`* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper3Jim Pennino
7 Dec 24 i `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2Bertietaylor
7 Dec 24 i  `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Jim Pennino
9 Dec 24 +- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Bertietaylor
14 Dec 24 `* Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper2bertietaylor
18 Dec07:53  `- Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper1Bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal