Re: The Apollo moon landings

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: The Apollo moon landings
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 11. Jun 2025, 07:30:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <e7d4acba3b11645eeb8786a9f465278e@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 2:28:07 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:37:11 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>
On 6/9/25 20:46, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 23:48:57 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:
>
On 10/06/25 09:21, David Canzi wrote:
On 6/9/25 18:10, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints.
>
If you make stuff up about the evidence instead of looking at the
evidence, you can remain proudly wrong for the rest of your life.
>
Speak for yourself. The big fat impious footprints on the Moon were
shown as evidence for Moon landing
>
I notice you deleted the link I provided you to a YouTube video
that shows astronauts who were not merely shuffling, but were
moving briskly.  And as a bonus, one of the astronauts stopped,
then jumped up and down vertically.  From that jump it's possible
to estimate the acceleration due to gravity, and it's way less
than on the Earth.  Here's the link again.
>
https://youtu.be/efzYblYVUFk?t=40
>
Arindam wondered why they were that deep. Surely some 50 Kg of thrust
spread out wide could not create that depth?
>
How deep are they?
>
Deeper than 115 Kg Arindam's prints upon a sandy by each.
Should be sandy beach. Actually Arindam saw how little impression he was
making on the sand or soil of the ancient Mungo site of the aborigines
of Australia. It was as near to the desolate lunar landscape as he ever
got to on Earth. The soil was far from compact and undisturbed. So how
could the lunar footprints get that deep unless they were on Earth with
heavy gear on them.
!
>
 Explain how you estimated the depth of
the footprints based on the image of them.
>
See the length, should be 30cm. Looks like the depth is easily more than
1 cm as that looks 1/30th of the length. Really deep.
>
>
 How deep should
they be?
>
As they weighed with suits not more than 60Kg and as Arindam's prints on
sand is not more than 5 mm deep they should be say be no more than 3mm
deep.
>
>
>
Explain how you know how much downward pressure
the astronaut's feet exerted on the dust, and how soft that
dust is.
60 kg max per foot or say 600 N force over footprint size say 300 sq cm.
So 2 Newton per square centimetre. That would be like placing a 200 gram
cylinder on a coin sized area. Well it would press down 3mm or less. On
the other hand if it was 250 kg weight on soil it would be as deep as
10mm as seen.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
>
--
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings7David Canzi
11 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings6Bertitaylor
11 Jun 25  +- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
12 Jun 25  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings4David Canzi
13 Jun 25   `* Re: The Apollo moon landings3Bertitaylor
13 Jun 25    `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2David Canzi
13 Jun 25     `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal