Re: The Apollo moon landings

On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:09:55 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:

On 6/13/2025 5:47 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

>
<snip old crap>
>
AI was asked to evaluate person b's response to person a:
>
Person A:
>

Did Einstein make relativity famous, or did relativity make
Einstein famous?  Over decades, Einstein's reputation as a great
genius developed.  There is something appealing about an eccentric
guy with messy hair who, nevertheless, has something between his
ears that works better than what's between most people's ears...
But in 1905, Einstein wasn't famous.  Scientists didn't accept
the theory because of who wrote it.  They read and understood
the reasoning, and found it to be credible.

>
Person B:
>

>
Nothing remotely credible about it. The whole idea was to get rid of the
aether as a basic fact as aether is AUM which is a Hindu concept. So, a
no-no from the Jew metaphysics forming the racist and bigoted western
mindset.
>
Tesla bitterly opposed the whole relativity nonsense so he was
comprehensively persecuted by the bigoted pseudoscientific elites.
>
>
WOOF woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor

>
Person B's response is problematic on multiple levels—intellectually,
logically, and ethically.

It is problematic for the gullible and the irrational, and all those
sans moral restraints.

Almost like posts of person P's and those
of other relativistic fanatics.

Apart from lying and abusing venomously they have no other strategy when
exposed as frauds.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--