Re: How Do We Know?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p guns 
Sujet : Re: How Do We Know?
De : anon (at) *nospam* anon.net (Anonymous)
Groupes : talk.politics.guns
Date : 27. Apr 2024, 23:57:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mixmin
Message-ID : <v0jsc1$34lrm$1@news.mixmin.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
Definition:
A *finder of fact* shall be defined as an impartial panel of one or
more persons designated by the legislative process and sworn under
oath of office to appraise and publish as a public record the facts
underlying a particular event or legal matter.  A finder of fact
employs the scientific method
...which is incapable of being the sole arbiter of truth. Even when
used properly, it can't even produce consistent scientific evidence.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Apr 24 * How Do We Know?11X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"
27 Apr 24 +* Re: How Do We Know?9Anonymous
28 Apr 24 i+* Re: How Do We Know?7X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"
1 May 24 ii`* Re: How Do We Know?6Anonymous
1 May 24 ii +* Re: How Do We Know?2D
2 May 24 ii i`- Re: How Do We Know?1X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"
2 May 24 ii `* Re: How Do We Know?3X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"
5 May 24 ii  `* Re: How Do We Know?2Anonymous
5 May 24 ii   `- Re: How Do We Know?1X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"
28 Apr 24 i`- Re: How Do We Know?1D
28 Apr 24 `- Re: How Do We Know?1X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal