Re: Building new prisons causes more prisoners

On 10/29/2024 7:45 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>

>
>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message news:o_PTO.249496$WXO8.117467@fx13.iad...

On 10/28/2024 10:11 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
"Ken" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message news:QAOTO.89027$7OO5.27721@fx43.iad...

On 10/28/2024 8:27 AM, Scout wrote:

>
>
"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message news:671bc470$0$1786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...

In article <FtPSO.26517$9Rk4.10335@fx37.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...

>
On 10/25/2024 7:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>

>
>
"Dawn Flood" <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vfes9n$2s3np$4@dont-email.me...

On 10/22/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter wrote:

In article <rxSRO.54739$KDwf.3770@fx01.iad>, >>> rudy@phil.hendrie.con
says...

>
This is a reply I made to Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>  >>>>  Shit-4-

Braincell back

when he was posting as "Lamey." Now he's denying having posted  >>>>

as >>>>
"Lamey," but

he's lying. He also used to post as "Jack Shit." What a fucking >>>>  loser.
>
On 6/16/2021 9:22 AM, Lamey wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:19:06 -0700, Rudy Canoza >>>>>

<js@phendrie.con>

wrote:
>

On 6/4/2021 9:35 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

This is absolutely true.  Research shows that the more new  >>>>>>>

prisons there

are,
the more petty crimes are prosecuted and the harsher and  >>>>>>>

longer the

sentences.
One of the big drivers of this is prison guard unions.  The  >>>>>>>

more prisons and

prisoners, the more jobs for prison guards.

>
More support:
>
"Life Without Parole Isn't Making Us Any Safer"
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/opinion/louisiana-criminal-

justice-

reform.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
>
That's a true statement. Life without parole is another  >>>>>>

gimmick to fill up

the
prisons.

>
It's called doing time for the crime you dingbat.
>

>
Life without parole for robbing a bank of $5,000 is simply  >>>> wrong.

>
Then dont do it.

>
A tiny number of people do, though, and will continue to do so.  >> >>

Point >>
is that

people can and do change while in prison.

>
Somehow, I bet it wasn't just the $5,000 that was taken.. I'm > pretty >

sure
one or

more people died due to a direct result of that crime. It is those >  > >

deaths
that

put you in prison without parole.

>
No one was killed in the bank robbery, scooter. Shots were fired, but no one was
hit. The sentence imposed was *solely* for the robbery, scooter. If you think
there was some other element to the sentencing, scooter, trot out your evidence.
But you don't have any and you never will.

>
If shots were fired than attempted murder should be on there.

>

>

 Does it make sense to imprison someone for having robbed a bank  >>

for >>  5K
some 5

years ago?  10? 50?  A year ago?

>
Well.. we could always just execute them.

>
That's not going to happen, scooter. You are not going to get the despotic state
that you want. You can move to North Korea if you want to live in a state that
summarily executes people for jaywalking, scooter.

>
No they don't.

>

However, show me a case were someone was given like [life] just for >  >

robbing a bank

of 5K... can't be for any other crime just the robbery of the > money.

*This* case, scooter ? the case of Robert Richardson detailed in the New York
Times (Gold Standard) story above. Richardson robbed a bank of $5,000. No one
was killed or even injured in the robbery and its aftermath.
>
And wouldn't you just know it? Richardson is a black man, and he was given a 60
year no-parole no-probation sentence in shithole Louisiana. And yes, a huge
majority of such sentences are imposed on black men in red shithole states.

>
Don't do the crime if you don't want the time.

>
If he didn't want the time, he should have taken the plea deal

>
Cite that there was a plea deal, scooter.

>
"In 1997 she and her husband Robert Richardson were convicted of a bank robbery in Louisiana. She got 13 years but was released after three and a half; Robert was dissuaded by his lawyer from taking a plea deal. He got 60 years."
>
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/oct/15/slavery-time-film-family-torn- apart-us-jail-industry-garrett-bradley-black
>
I acknowledge your admission that you know next to nothing about the case, and as such your opinions on the subject are therefore of very little consequence.
>
Rudy, haven't you learned by now.. that I'm almost always right while you are almost never right?

>
This is the first time in all your years of pissing away time in Usenet — at >> least two decades — that you have been right, scooter.

>
Rudy acknowledges that my knowledge and logic are superior to his.

>
No, scooter. You're the blind squirrel who found an acorn this time. I am your superior in every dimension, scooter.