Sujet : Re: Two Pervasive Myths Surrounding the Second Amendment
De : klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter. (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Klaus Schadenfreude)
Groupes : talk.politics.gunsDate : 21. Dec 2024, 17:49:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza School of Fisticuffs and Frantic Retreat
Message-ID : <u9sdmjt2eh0spgep2jpv869b07jjq0j7mf@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
[Default] "X, formerly known as \"!Jones\"" <
x@y.com> typed:
There are two pervas[..]
#942 in the Jones' FakeFacts Series
"This is easily seen in the ratification debates: self defense was
never mentioned."
-!Jones, Message-ID: <
9mq3php4uqcs3qhkgiu7c72lkbam9l71ma@4ax.com>
conveniently skipping over
That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of
themselves and their own state, or the United States, or for the
purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed for
disarming the people or any of them, unless for crimes committed, or
real danger of public injury from individuals; and as standing armies
in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be
kept up; and that the military shall be kept under strict
subordination to and be governed by the civil power.
Robert Whitehill Proposal in the Pennsylvania Convention, 12 December
1787
#942 in the Jones' FakeFacts Series
Collect Them All!