Re: Civil War Wasn't About Slavery? What?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p guns 
Sujet : Re: Civil War Wasn't About Slavery? What?
De : petzlx (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Petzl)
Groupes : talk.politics.guns
Date : 07. Jun 2025, 01:27:07
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <bp174khnces0noa24jivq95eathia3nbcu@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 23:58:52 -0000 (UTC), Mark Brix <x@y.com> wrote:

Peter Jason wrote:
>
>
>
Democrats knew what they were doing.  They had the blacks bred like
cattle.  That hasn't worked out so well for their gay grooming trans
recruitment efforts.  Seems they have to resort to drugs and social
media to get new victims, ahem, members.
>
I thought it was all about cotton.
>
>
It's the Jews again.  Ask Trump's sideman.  A guy called Stephen Miller.
>
He changed his name because he didn't want anyone to know he's Jewish and
part of the whole deal to do with Israel getting all that money every year.  
$80 Bil a year is pretty good welfare and nobody complains about it coming
out of our pockets and going straight to the coffers of foreigners in the
Middle East.
>
"Our" Media and Major parties are run by lobbyists.
Lobbyists write the laws, parliament sells the laws, aid lucrative
commissions for passing their laws.
That’s the modern legislative business of parliament. When we talk
about paying-off politicians in third-world countries we call it
bribery.However, when we undertake the same process in parliament. we
call it lobbying.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jun 25 o Re: Civil War Wasn't About Slavery? What?1Petzl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal