Re: The joy of FORTRAN

Liste des GroupesRevenir à af computers 
Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 26. Feb 2025, 23:17:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
On 2/25/25 2:33 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
I went from DEC20 FORTRAN to pdp11 Basic (it had matrix math) to DEC SAIL
(Algol) to Pascal to C to Python
 
  Sounds familiar ... though 'C' became available on
  the PDP-11s (was writ on them). Still pref Pascal
  over Python where possible.
 
Assembler and COBOL were needed but avoided
 
  Better ASM than COBOL  :-)

Depends on what you want to do. Assembler is a lot more fun, but I wouldn’t
want to write a payroll system in it.

 
  ASM can give you kind of a buzz, makes you one
  with the machine.
 
  Alas if I'd learned more COBOL then I could have
  had a lucrative retirement income supp maintaining
  all those old biz/ops code. Still LOTS of it in
  use and it's too expensive now to replace. If it
  works you hang on to it with a death grip.
 

It’s not just COBOL any more, it’s all COBOL/CICS/DB2. Same with PL/I.

--
Pete

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal