Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 26. Feb 2025, 23:17:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
c186282 <
c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
On 2/25/25 2:33 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
I went from DEC20 FORTRAN to pdp11 Basic (it had matrix math) to DEC SAIL
(Algol) to Pascal to C to Python
Sounds familiar ... though 'C' became available on
the PDP-11s (was writ on them). Still pref Pascal
over Python where possible.
Assembler and COBOL were needed but avoided
Better ASM than COBOL :-)
Depends on what you want to do. Assembler is a lot more fun, but I wouldn’t
want to write a payroll system in it.
ASM can give you kind of a buzz, makes you one
with the machine.
Alas if I'd learned more COBOL then I could have
had a lucrative retirement income supp maintaining
all those old biz/ops code. Still LOTS of it in
use and it's too expensive now to replace. If it
works you hang on to it with a death grip.
It’s not just COBOL any more, it’s all COBOL/CICS/DB2. Same with PL/I.
-- Pete