Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 25. Feb 2025, 23:47:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1924764604.762215659.468999.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Scott Lurndal <
scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> writes:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:43:06 -0700
Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote:
Assembler and COBOL were needed but avoided
Assembler can be fun.
Especially PDP-10 assembler. Wonderful instruction set.
Need to play around with -10 assembler sometime.* The -11 architecture
is also very nice (if more limited for Large Programs) - not hard to
see why a number of microprocessor designers took inspiration from it.
From what I've seen of the PDP-10, the VAX-11 instruction set
was superior. I'm sure the PDP-10 folks will disagree, but
simply thinking about character handling on the PDP-10 gives one
a headache.
Au contraire. From what I remember from 50 years ago, The idea of defining
different-sized bytes is a real plus. Pity it was limited to word
boundaries, or it would have been actual BitBlt instructions. Several
machines use byte pointers in memory - Honeywell 6000 EIS instructions, and
I believe XDS Sigma. Quite flexible once you’re used to it.
-- Pete