Re: The joy of FORTRAN

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024, Peter Flass wrote:

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:

On 17/10/2024 15:10, Scott Lurndal wrote:

The facts are that Democratic administrations have been shown to
provide far better economic growth than any Republican administration,
and far less gets added to the deficit and ultimately the debt.

>
My impression is that it is in fact the reverse.

>
Your impressions aren't facts.  Look it up.
>
https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democrats/2024/10/the-u-s-economy-performs-better-under-democratic-presidents
>

>
Nice try Scott. A .gov article in election times, of course they'll sell
the democrats. Try harder next time! ;)
>
It is a logical fact that republicans are good for the economy long term,
and that socialism trashes the economy. You cannot argue against this in
any credible way.
>

>
Except that no one running is a Socialist. In European terms this would be
Social Democrats against AfD or Marine LePen’s group, or the NSDAP.
>

Incorrect. The democrats are socialists. I read somewhere that Camela is also trans, but don't have the energy to dig up the article.