Re: The joy of FORTRAN

On 09/10/2024 21:36, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

candycanearter07 wrote this post; take it under advisement:
 

186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 03:07 this Friday (GMT):

On 10/3/24 6:40 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 22:26 this Thursday (GMT):

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:00:05 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 21:58 this Monday (GMT):
>

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:48:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>

I suspect PayPal and Ebay actually do still use COBOL somewhere

>
Where would they have got it from? They were both entrepreneurial
startups, offering an entirely new kind of financial/commercial service
essentially from scratch.

>
/Sometimes/ having an outdated system is beneficial (CloudFlare
disaster)

>
Did COBOL have something to do with that?

>
Oh, I meant more the couple of companies that managed to keep running
stuff, like Southwest.

>
    Well ... sometimes an 'obsolete' language as the
    base of your operations - kinda like "Latin" - it
    doesn't really CHANGE anymore, No COBOL-2025 where
    they've changed half the stuff .......
>
    As such "obsolete" CAN equal "stability".

>
Like debian?

 Debian has 3 levels: stable, testing, and unstable (Sid).
 Pick your poison. I used Sid for many years. Currently I use Testing,
which means sometimes my updates have to be delayed a few hours (as told by
the aptitude interfaces).
 

I  ditched debian because stable was years behind the curve, Mint appearto be based on 'testing'
--
The New Left are the people they warned you about.