Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : cross (at) *nospam* spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Mar 2025, 22:05:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <vq55if$7ae$1@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
vq52ov$1f9re$3@dont-email.me>,
The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 03/03/2025 19:19, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:24:04 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 03/03/2025 10:05, Niklas Karlsson wrote:
Some would probably get on your case for being profligate with vertical
space... but honestly, it doesn't much matter with the kind of screen
real estate we have these days. I do agree that your style has
readability benefits.
>
Yes. Back in the day when I debugged with 80 column dot matrix
printouts, it got messy.
To day with collapsible blocks on a gui it's a lot easier
I still prefer statements that don't exceed 80 columns.
So do I but it gets unavoidable when toy are passing sixty plus
variables to a function.
If you're passing sixty plus variables to a function, then line
length limits are the least of your problems.
- Dan C.
…