Re: Microsoft makes a lot of money, Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 9:38:36 +0000, David Brown wrote:

>
If you are talking about drawings, rather than photographs, then png
would be a better choice than jpg.  (Assuming, of course, that Word
supports png...)

My drawing tool does not support *.png
Why is *.png any better than compressed/compressible *.jpg and my
drawings look perfect at 200 dpi resolution--probably because I do
any zoom in or out before converting to*.jpg. An example: I have a
large pipeline drawing showing every single feature of a particular
implementation. By zooming in, each stage in the pipeline has the
width of a page, but because all the figures originate from the
large drawing (and the colors match across the whole document)
it is much easier to grasp the details.
In any event, I have been doing it that way since 2000 (maybe before)
and see no particular reason to change. When the size of the disk on
the PC was 80 MB, you may have an argument, when the size of the disk
on the PC is 4TB and a 6 YO machine still has ½ of its free space let;
size doesn't matter, and when it does *.doc -> *.pdf does the job.
Note: *.doc not *.docx
My software is from 2 decades ago:: draw 1999, office 2003.