Sujet : Re: Cray style vectors
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 11. Mar 2024, 19:10:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240311201015.00006482@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:01:31 -0000 (UTC)
Thomas Koenig <
tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> schrieb:
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> schrieb:
On 20/02/2024 07:31, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Even further on the side: I wrote up a proposal for finally
introducing a wrapping UNSIGNED type to Fortran, which hopefully
will be considered in the next J3 meeting, it can be found at
https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/24-102.txt .
In this proposal, I intended to forbid UNSIGNED variables in
DO loops, especially for this sort of reason.
(Testing a new news server, my old one was decomissioned...)
I was quite delighted, but also a little bit surprised that the
proposal (somewhat modified) actually passed.
Now, what's left is the people who do not want modular arithmetic,
for a reason that I am unable to fathom. I guess they don't like
multiplicative hashes...
What do they like?
To declare unsigned overflow UB? Or implementation defined? Or
trapping?