Sujet : Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 03. Jun 2024, 11:22:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240603132227.00004e0f@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:03:53 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:31:46 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
30 years ago you could say the same thing about encryption.
I don’t think newer CPUs have been optimized for encryption. Instead,
we see newer encryption algorithms (or ways of using them) that work
better on current CPUs.
I think moderate efficiency on CPU, not too low, but not high either,
is a requirement for (symmetric-key) cipher. Esp. when the key is
128-bit or shorter.
For example, when I was first learning about
computer encryption, I was told that CBC (“Cipher-Block Chaining”)
mode was teh hawtness,
CBC decrypt is easily parallelized. Encrypt - not so
much.
but nowadays it’s all about GFC (“Galois-Field
Counter”) mode.
GCM is far more common spelling.