Sujet : Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 30. Jul 2024, 10:04:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240730120459.00006176@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:10:05 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:00:55 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
Having gone through the transition (1-wide IO, 2-wide IO, 6-wide
OoO) the OoO machine was simply less complexity--or to say it a
different way--the complexity was more orderly (and more easily
verified).
Isn’t it true that a recent out-of-order processor can have something
like 100 instructions in flight at the same time? (Probably more by
now.)
That would be equivalent to a 100-wide in-order processor, would it
not?
It would not.
Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600
Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600