Sujet : Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 22. Sep 2024, 00:57:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240922025721.00002910@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:34:40 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:29:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
CPU's that are hyper close to the memory is good wrt locality.
However, the programming for it might turn some programmers off.
NUMA like for sure.
I’m pretty sure those multi-million-node Linux supers that fill the
top of the Top500 list have a NUMA-style memory-addressing model.
You are wrong.
Last ccNuma was pushed out of top100 more than a decade ago.
All top machines today are MPP or clusters.
Not that a diffference between the two is well-defined.
After consulting Wikipeadia, it's probably far more than a decade.
The last one that I thought to be ccNuma, was in fact a cluster of
10 ccNuma computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_(supercomputer)