Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:21:12 -0000 (UTC)
Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> wrote:

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:

On 20/09/2024 07:46, Thomas Koenig wrote: 

Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb: 

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote: 

Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> schrieb:
 

Quantum mechanics is high IQ bullshit to make professors look
important. 

 
You need quantum mechanics to describe solid-state electronics
(or all atoms, for that matter). 

 
Type “quantum mechanics criticism” and variants into Google and
have at it. 

 
I've read enough crackpot theories already, thank you, I don't need
any more. 

 
Quantum mechanics describes the rules that give structure to atoms
and molecules.  On a larger scale, those structures build up to
explain spherical planets.  But we know the earth is flat.
Therefore, quantum mechanics is bullshit.  What more evidence could
you want? 

 
 
Yup, you just explained the Einstein argument, just like I said.
 

Einstein didn't like Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
He didn't question the validity of equations.
It's all was in different era. Philosophical interpretations were
considered important.
The next generations of physicists, say, those who were born 100 or
less years ago, were much less obsessed with this sort of stuff. Of
course, there are exceptions, even to this day.