Re: is Vax addressing sane today

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: is Vax addressing sane today
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 24. Sep 2024, 09:37:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240924113703.00002a90@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:02:23 +0200
Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> wrote:

MitchAlsup1 wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:57:08 +0000, Kent Dickey wrote:
 
In article <O2DHO.184073$kxD8.113118@fx11.iad>,
EricP  <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> wrote: 
 
The x86 designers might then have had an incentive to make all the
checks as efficient as possible, and rather than eliminate them,
they might have enhanced and more tightly integrated them. 
>
OK, my post was about how having a hardware trap-on-overflow
instruction (or a mode for existing ALU instructions) is useless
for anything OTHER than as a debug aid where you crash the problem
on overflow (you can have a general exception handler to shut down
gracefully, but "patching things
up and continuing" doesn't work).  I gave details of reasons folks
might want to try to use trap-on-overflow instructions, and show
how the other cases don't make sense.
>
In no way was I ever arguing that checking for overflow was a bad
idea, or a language issue, or anything else.  Just that CPUs
should not bother having trap-on-overflow instructions. 
<snip> 
So why should any hardware include an instruction to
trap-on-overflow?
>
Trap-on-overflow instruction have a hardware cost, of varying
severity. If the ISA isn't already trapping on ALU instructions
(such as divide-by-0), it adds a new class of operations which can
take exceptions.  An ALU functional unit that cannot take
exceptions doesn't have to save "unwinding" info (at minimum, info
to recover the PC, and possibly rollback state), and not needing
this can be a nice simplification.  Branches and LD/ST always
needs this info, but not needing it on ALU ops can be a nice
simplification of logic, and makes it
easier to have multiple ALU functional units.  Note that x86 INTO
can be treated as a branch, so it doesn't have the cost of an
instruction like "ADDTO r1,r2,r3" which is a normal ADD but where
the ADD itself traps if it overflows.  ADDTO is particularly what
I am arguing against--
it is just a bad idea for the ISA to have ALU instructions take
exceptions. 
 
You argue that trap-on-overflow as an instruction is unnecessary
AND
You argue that overflow detection is worthwhile
AND
You argue that ALU should not raise overflow exceptions
 
I am at a loss for how to take all 3 arguments together at the
same time !?! Can you explain ?? 
 
Maybe all add/sub/etc opcodes that are immediately followed by an
INTO could be fused into a single ADDO/SUBO/etc version that takes
zero extra cycles as long as the trap part isn't hit?
 
Personally I'm happy with the clang approach.
 

Couple of questions:
1. Which code would you put at destination of jo branch?
2. In your code generator would every jo in the code (or in the module,
or in the function) jump to the same destination or each will have
destination of its own.

It would be interesting if you answer before looking at what clang does,
then take a look and comment again.

Terje
 



Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Sep 24 * is Vax adressing sane today336Brett
5 Sep 24 +* Re: is Vax adressing sane today324John Dallman
6 Sep 24 i+- Re: is Vax adressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Sep 24 i`* Re: is Vax adressing sane today322Anton Ertl
6 Sep 24 i +- Re: is Vax adressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Sep 24 i +* Re: is Vax adressing sane today5MitchAlsup1
7 Sep 24 i i`* Re: is Vax adressing sane today4Anton Ertl
7 Sep 24 i i `* Re: is Vax adressing sane today3Anton Ertl
7 Sep 24 i i  `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2John Dallman
7 Sep 24 i i   `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Anton Ertl
7 Sep 24 i +* Re: is Vax adressing sane today313John Levine
8 Sep 24 i i`* Re: is Vax adressing sane today312Anton Ertl
8 Sep 24 i i +* Re: is Vax adressing sane today304MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i i i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today303Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24 i i i +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today231MitchAlsup1
9 Sep 24 i i i i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today230Brett
9 Sep 24 i i i i +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today7MitchAlsup1
10 Sep 24 i i i i i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today6Niklas Holsti
11 Sep 24 i i i i i +- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 i i i i i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Stephen Fuld
25 Sep 24 i i i i i  `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Michael S
25 Sep 24 i i i i i   `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
25 Sep 24 i i i i i    `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Niklas Holsti
10 Sep 24 i i i i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today222Anton Ertl
10 Sep 24 i i i i  +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Michael S
10 Sep 24 i i i i  i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Anton Ertl
10 Sep 24 i i i i  i +- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Niklas Holsti
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Michael S
11 Sep 24 i i i i  +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today6Michael S
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today5David Brown
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i  +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Thomas Koenig
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i  i`- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1David Brown
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i  `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2David Schultz
13 Sep 24 i i i i  i   `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1David Brown
11 Sep 24 i i i i  +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today5John Levine
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Thomas Koenig
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Anton Ertl
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i i`- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1jseigh
11 Sep 24 i i i i  i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1John Levine
20 Sep 24 i i i i  `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today205Kent Dickey
21 Sep 24 i i i i   +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4MitchAlsup1
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i  `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Sep 24 i i i i   +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3MitchAlsup1
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i +- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Niklas Holsti
21 Sep 24 i i i i   i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Sep 24 i i i i   +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today30MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   i+* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today18John Levine
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii+- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1Michael S
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii+* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii`* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today7Chris M. Thomasson
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii `* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today6MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii  +* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii  i`- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii  +- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii  `* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today2John Dallman
22 Sep 24 i i i i   iii   `- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii+* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today5Terje Mathisen
24 Sep 24 i i i i   iii`* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i i i i   iii `* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today3Chris M. Thomasson
24 Sep 24 i i i i   iii  `* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
16 Oct 24 i i i i   iii   `- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii`* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today3Lars Poulsen
24 Sep 24 i i i i   ii `* Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i i i i   ii  `- Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today1Michael S
22 Sep 24 i i i i   i+* Re: is Vax addressing sane today7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today6MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Sep 24 i i i i   ii `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Anton Ertl
24 Sep 24 i i i i   ii  `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
24 Sep 24 i i i i   i+* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Stefan Monnier
24 Sep 24 i i i i   ii`- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
25 Sep 24 i i i i   i+- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
12 Oct 24 i i i i   i`- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Anton Ertl
22 Sep 24 i i i i   +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Thomas Koenig
24 Sep 24 i i i i   i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Kent Dickey
24 Sep 24 i i i i   i +- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Bill Findlay
24 Sep 24 i i i i   i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Thomas Koenig
23 Sep 24 i i i i   +- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Stefan Monnier
23 Sep 24 i i i i   `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today161Kent Dickey
24 Sep 24 i i i i    +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today11MitchAlsup1
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i+- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today9Terje Mathisen
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today4Michael S
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Terje Mathisen
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Michael S
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i i  `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Stephen Fuld
24 Sep 24 i i i i    i i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
25 Sep 24 i i i i    i i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Stephen Fuld
12 Oct 24 i i i i    i `- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Anton Ertl
24 Sep 24 i i i i    +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3Terje Mathisen
29 Sep 24 i i i i    i+- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Michael S
7 Oct 24 i i i i    i`- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1Kent Dickey
25 Sep 24 i i i i    +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today133MitchAlsup1
26 Sep 24 i i i i    i+- Re: is Vax addressing sane today1MitchAlsup1
28 Sep 24 i i i i    i`* Re: is Vax addressing sane today131Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i i i i    +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today3George Neuner
7 Oct 24 i i i i    +* Re: is Vax addressing sane today8Kent Dickey
12 Oct 24 i i i i    `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today2Anton Ertl
9 Sep 24 i i i `* Re: is Vax addressing sane today71Anton Ertl
8 Sep 24 i i `* Re: is Vax adressing sane today7Brett
8 Sep 24 i `* Re: is Vax adressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
6 Sep 24 +* Re: is Vax adressing sane today2MitchAlsup1
6 Sep 24 +- Re: is Vax adressing sane today1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Sep 24 `* Re: is Vax adressing sane today8Anton Ertl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal