Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 22. Oct 2024, 02:19:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <864j55vss9.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:08:20 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 19:49:59 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
On 2024-10-16, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
The first C standard wasn't published until 1985.
>
Wasn't it 1989?
>
As I recall, the ANSI standard corresponded to the second edition of the
K&R book.
>
I may be mistaken, but my recollection is that '89 ANSI corresponded
to the Kernighan and Plauger book.

The book by Kernighan and Ritchie, The C Programming Language, was
first published in 1978;  the second edition was published in 1988.

The book by Kernighan and Plauger, Elements of Programming Style,
was first published in 1974, with a second edition published in 1978.

The second edition of K&R was written during the time that the C
standardization effort (started roughly 1982) was taking place.  The
intent of K&R 2 was to reflect the language specification of the
anticipated ANSI C standard.  My understanding is that K&R 2, because
it was finished a year or two before the ANSI C standard was finished,
has some minor differences with respect to C89.  (I have not made any
effort to see whether that is so;  I am simply passing along second
hand information.)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Oct 24 * Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)387MitchAlsup1
1 Oct 24 `* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)386Thomas Koenig
1 Oct 24  +* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)379MitchAlsup1
2 Oct 24  i+* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)377Brett
3 Oct 24  ii`* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)376Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24  ii +- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Brett
3 Oct 24  ii +- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Anton Ertl
3 Oct 24  ii `* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)373David Brown
3 Oct 24  ii  `* Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)372Anton Ertl
3 Oct 24  ii   +- Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)1David Brown
3 Oct 24  ii   +* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)369Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24  ii   i+- Re: Byte ordering1Lynn Wheeler
4 Oct 24  ii   i+* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)365David Brown
4 Oct 24  ii   ii`* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)364Anton Ertl
4 Oct 24  ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering5BGB
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i`* Re: Byte ordering4MitchAlsup1
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i +* Re: Byte ordering2BGB
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i i`- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i `- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i`* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)12Brett
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)11Anton Ertl
5 Oct 24  ii   ii i  `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)10Michael S
6 Oct 24  ii   ii i   +- Re: Byte ordering1Terje Mathisen
6 Oct 24  ii   ii i   `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)8Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i    `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i     `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)6Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i      `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)5Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       +* Re: Byte ordering2Stefan Monnier
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       i`- Re: Byte ordering1Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii i       `* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii i        `- Re: Byte ordering1Terje Mathisen
6 Oct 24  ii   ii `* Re: Byte ordering345David Brown
6 Oct 24  ii   ii  `* Re: Byte ordering344Anton Ertl
6 Oct 24  ii   ii   +* Re: Byte ordering189John Dallman
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i+* Re: Byte ordering20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii`* Re: Byte ordering19John Dallman
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii +- VMS/NT memory management (was: Byte ordering)1Stefan Monnier
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii +* Re: Byte ordering2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii i`- Re: Byte ordering1MitchAlsup1
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii `* Re: Byte ordering15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  +* Re: Byte ordering3Michael S
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i+- Re: Byte ordering1John Dallman
18 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i`- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  +* Re: Byte ordering9John Dallman
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i+* Re: Byte ordering7George Neuner
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii`* Re: Byte ordering6Terje Mathisen
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii `* Re: Byte ordering5David Brown
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii  +* Re: Byte ordering2George Neuner
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii  i`- Re: Byte ordering1David Brown
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii  `* Re: clouds, not Byte ordering2John Levine
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  ii   `- Re: clouds, not Byte ordering1David Brown
18 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  i`- Re: Byte ordering1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii  `* Re: Byte ordering2Paul A. Clayton
18 Oct 24  ii   ii   ii   `- Re: Microkernels & Capabilities (was Re: Byte ordering)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i`* 80286 protected mode168Anton Ertl
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i +* Re: 80286 protected mode5Lars Poulsen
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i`* Re: 80286 protected mode4Terje Mathisen
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i +- Re: 80286 protected mode1Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i `* Re: 80286 protected mode2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  `- Re: 80286 protected mode1Terje Mathisen
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i +* Re: 80286 protected mode3Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i`* Re: 80286 protected mode2Michael S
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i `- Re: 80286 protected mode1Brett
7 Oct 24  ii   ii   i +- Re: 80286 protected mode1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i +* Re: 80286 protected mode152MitchAlsup1
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i+* Re: 80286 protected mode4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i ii`* Re: 80286 protected mode3MitchAlsup1
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i ii +- Re: 80286 protected mode1David Brown
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   i ii `- Re: 80286 protected mode1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i`* Re: 80286 protected mode147Anton Ertl
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i +- Re: 80286 protected mode1Robert Finch
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i `* Re: 80286 protected mode145David Brown
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  +* Re: 80286 protected mode79MitchAlsup1
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i`* Re: 80286 protected mode78David Brown
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i `* Re: 80286 protected mode77Stephen Fuld
10 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i  +* Re: 80286 protected mode2MitchAlsup1
10 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i  i`- Re: 80286 protected mode1David Brown
10 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i  +- Re: 80286 protected mode1David Brown
11 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i  `* Re: 80286 protected mode73Tim Rentsch
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i   `* Re: 80286 protected mode72Stefan Monnier
15 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    +* Re: 80286 protected mode30MitchAlsup1
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    i+* Re: 80286 protected mode25MitchAlsup1
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    ii+* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode13John Levine
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii+* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode7MitchAlsup1
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii`* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode6John Levine
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii `* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode5Thomas Koenig
20 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii  `* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii   `* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode3George Neuner
22 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii    `* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode2Tim Rentsch
22 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii     `- Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode1George Neuner
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii+- Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode1David Brown
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii`* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode4Paul A. Clayton
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii +- Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode1David Brown
20 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii `* Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii  `- Re: C and turtles, 80286 protected mode1Paul A. Clayton
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    ii+* Re: 80286 protected mode7Thomas Koenig
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii+* Re: 80286 protected mode2MitchAlsup1
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iiii`- Re: 80286 protected mode1Tim Rentsch
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii`* Re: 80286 protected mode4Tim Rentsch
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    iii `* Re: fine points of dynamic memory allocation, not 80286 protected mode3John Levine
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    ii+* Re: 80286 protected mode3George Neuner
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    ii`- Re: 80286 protected mode1Tim Rentsch
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    i+* Re: 80286 protected mode3David Brown
17 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    i`- Re: 80286 protected mode1Tim Rentsch
16 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  i    `* Re: 80286 protected mode41David Brown
9 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  +* Re: 80286 protected mode51Thomas Koenig
13 Oct 24  ii   ii   i i  `* Re: 80286 protected mode14Anton Ertl
8 Oct 24  ii   ii   i `* Re: 80286 protected mode6John Levine
3 Jan 25  ii   ii   `* Re: Byte ordering154Waldek Hebisch
6 Oct 24  ii   i`* Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)2Michael S
3 Oct 24  ii   `- Re: Byte ordering (was: Whether something is RISC or not)1John Dallman
2 Oct 24  i`- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Thomas Koenig
2 Oct 24  +* Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)5David Schultz
3 Oct 24  `- Re: Whether something is RISC or not (Re: PDP-8 theology, not Concertina II Progress)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal