Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond
De : quadibloc (at) *nospam* servername.invalid (John Savard)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 02. Jun 2024, 03:00:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <9fkn5jpktrh41mad227v75qdqkbt2g1jsd@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 07:47:49 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig
<tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
John Savard <quadibloc@servername.invalid> schrieb:

If they took it to its logical conclusion, and packaged zArchitecture
chips without the ability to run current IBM operating systems in the
same way as POWER chips, I might actually be interested.

Would you like to buy one, then?  That would be a large investment
of money and space in your home...  but then again, an 18-year old
once bought a z890, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45X4VP8CGtk

Well, when I said "packaged... in the same way as POWER chips", I
meant that they would make systems with fewer CPUs than a mainframe
which were in the category of ordinary desktop computers if they were
to do that... which, of course, they won't.

John Savard

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Jun 24 * Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond6John Savard
2 Jun 24 `* Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond5Thomas Koenig
2 Jun 24  +* Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond3John Levine
3 Jun 24  i`* Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond2OrangeFish
3 Jun 24  i `- Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond1John Levine
4 Jun 24  `- Re: architectural goals, Byte Addressability And Beyond1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal