Re: x86S Specification

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: x86S Specification
De : mitchalsup (at) *nospam* aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 22. Oct 2024, 23:17:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <a53c7d9019d5fbfb0745a8ccf8cdb345@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:59:46 +0000, George Neuner wrote:

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:03:43 +0000, mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
wrote:
>
x86's long term survival depends on things out of AMD's and Intel's
hands. It depends on high volume access to devices people will buy
new every year or every other year. A PC is not such a thing, while
a cell phone seems to be.
>
Only because the average cell phone gets broken or flooded within a
year.  If people were not so careless, I doubt most would be replaced
so often.
>
My current phone is over 4 years old and it continues to serve all of
my needs.  Sans damage, the only reason I would choose to replace it
would be when critical apps no longer support the OS version.
My first cell phone (Galaxy 3) I got in 2012 and used it until 2022
when the service provider offered a zero cost upgrade because they
were loosing access to the 4G-LTE antennae. I did put in 2 new
batteries, and nothing was scratched or dented after 11 years of use.
I still liked it better than the Galaxy 12 I have now. ...
Oh and BTW:: I do not carry my cell phone unless I am traveling
or expecting a call. It lives in my office--probably why it is
not being damaged by being sat upon or dropped into water, and
other causes of cell phone death.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Oct 24 * Re: x86S Specification30BGB
22 Oct 24 +* Re: x86S Specification27MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24 i+* Re: x86S Specification12John Levine
22 Oct 24 ii+* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 iii+- Re: x86S Specification1John Dallman
23 Oct 24 iii`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii`* Re: x86S Specification8Anton Ertl
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification2John Dallman
23 Oct 24 ii i`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 ii `* Re: x86S Specification2BGB
23 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i+- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: x86S Specification13George Neuner
23 Oct 24 i `* Re: x86S Specification12MitchAlsup1
24 Oct 24 i  `* Re: x86S Specification11George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i   `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification10John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 i    i`- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1BGB
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i    i`* Re: old phones, x86S Specification3John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    i +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1John Levine
26 Oct 24 i    i `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Michael S
25 Oct 24 i    +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i    `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2yeti
25 Oct 24 i     `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Robert Finch
22 Oct 24 `* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24  `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal