Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:44:24 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:I have no idea what you mean by that.
On 2024-09-19 2:47, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:Is there some ongoing “Nature’s Rentware” involved?
>On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:09:53 GMT, Anton Ertl wrote:>
>He mentioned that several physics breakthroughs>
are needed for quantum computing to become useful.
The biggest one would be getting around the fundamental problem that
you can’t get something for nothing.
Stupid argument. Look at the effort and tech it takes to make quantum
computers... that is not "nothing".
The /fact/ that quantum mechanics describes how the world works, entanglement and all, does not depend on the various attempts to "interpret" or understand its foundations.That’s called the “many worlds interpretation” of quantum mechanics, andThe promise of an exponential increase in computing power for a linear>
increase in the number of processing elements sounds very much like
“something for nothing” under another name, wouldn’t you say?
No, it is exploiting the very non-intuitive nature of quantum
entanglement to create an exponential number of collective states of a
linear number of elements.
it is philosophical mumbo-jumbo nonsense.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.