Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?

On 2024-09-28 5:44, Brett wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:42:58 -0000 (UTC), Brett wrote:
>

Now go find the other missing billion rings Einstein predicted.

>
Where did he predict that?

 All galaxies that have another galaxy behind at a reasonable range should
show Einstein rings.
 Billions.

Whether such a ring is detected by our telescopes depends on the closeness of the alignment of the galaxies with the line of sight from us and on their brightness, size, and structure. It also depends on the properties of the telescopes that have looked at these galaxies and on how astronomers have analysed the images from those telescopes.
Can you show a calculation of how many rings, of some defined quality (completeness, shape, signal-to-noise level) should have been seen and detected in all astronomical observations to date?
Your arguments are like those of a Flat Earth fanatic who observes that the horizon looks like a straight line, even when compared to a meter-long ruler, and who then thinks this proves that the Earth is flat, but who does not calculate whether that "looks straight" test can detect the small curvature of the horizon as seen from eye height above a globe with a radius of over 6300 kilometers.
(Yes, I have seen a Youtube video from a Flat Earth fanatic making that argument :-( )