Re: Article on new mainframe use

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Article on new mainframe use
De : jgd (at) *nospam* cix.co.uk (John Dallman)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 11:56:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <memo.20240901115652.19028I@jgd.cix.co.uk>
References : 1
In article <vb05om$162j5$2@dont-email.me>, ldo@nz.invalid (Lawrence
D'Oliveiro) wrote:

As I recall, IBM wasn't part of CODASYL, and had no part in COBOL
development. So it had the usual _NIH_ attitude and was trying to
push PL/I as its all-singing, all-dancing language for both business
and scientific use, for some time.

I'm afraid you recall incorrectly. IBM had a significant part in the
design of COBOL in 1959-60 and implemented it early on.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COBOL>

They did later try to promote PL/1 as "the language for everything," but
the language design effort started in 1963, and the first compiler was
delivered in 1966.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/I>

John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Aug 24 * Article on new mainframe use132Stephen Fuld
14 Aug 24 +* Re: Article on new mainframe use124MitchAlsup1
15 Aug 24 i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use123George Neuner
15 Aug 24 i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
15 Aug 24 i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use121MitchAlsup1
15 Aug 24 i  +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
15 Aug 24 i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use118Niklas Holsti
16 Aug 24 i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use117Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Aug 24 i  i +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use30John Levine
17 Aug 24 i  i i+* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Aug 24 i  i ii+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
17 Aug 24 i  i ii`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3Keith Thompson
18 Aug 24 i  i ii `* Re: coroutines in COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2John Levine
18 Aug 24 i  i ii  `- Re: coroutines in COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Aug 24 i  i i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use24OrangeFish
18 Aug 24 i  i i +- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
18 Aug 24 i  i i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use22John Dallman
18 Aug 24 i  i i  +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use14MitchAlsup1
19 Aug 24 i  i i  i+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Dallman
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use12Terje Mathisen
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use11Michael S
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use10Terje Mathisen
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i   `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use9Michael S
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i    +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use6John Levine
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3MitchAlsup1
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Keith Thompson
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i    i   `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i    `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2John Dallman
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i     `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Aug 24 i  i i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Aug 24 i  i i   `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use6John Levine
21 Aug 24 i  i i    `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Aug 24 i  i i     `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Keith Thompson
21 Aug 24 i  i i      `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3MitchAlsup1
21 Aug 24 i  i i       +- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Keith Thompson
2 Sep 24 i  i i       `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Tim Rentsch
16 Aug 24 i  i +* Re: Article on new mainframe use82George Neuner
22 Aug 24 i  i i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use81BGB
23 Aug 24 i  i i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
23 Aug 24 i  i i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use79Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Aug 24 i  i i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use77BGB
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i+- Re: libraries, was Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use75Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1BGB
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use73John Levine
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use70Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use69John Levine
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i  `* Re: Article on new mainframe use67Michael S
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   +* Re: Article on new mainframe use12John Levine
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i`* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use11John Levine
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i +* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use8Stefan Monnier
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i+* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii`* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Terje Mathisen
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii +* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii i`- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anssi Saari
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii `- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i+- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i`- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1George Neuner
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i `* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i  `- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   +* Re: Article on new mainframe use6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i+* Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use3John Levine
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   ii+- Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use1Lynn Wheeler
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   ii`- Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use2John Dallman
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   `* Re: Article on new mainframe use48Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i    `* Re: Article on new mainframe use47MitchAlsup1
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i     `* Re: Article on new mainframe use46Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i      `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use45John Levine
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       +- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       +- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use42Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2Terje Mathisen
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        i`- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use39John Levine
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use37John Dallman
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i+- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i+* transparent huge pages (was: Address bits again)4Anton Ertl
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii+- Re: transparent huge pages1MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii+- Re: transparent huge pages1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii`- Re: transparent huge pages (was: Address bits again)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i`* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use31John Levine
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use30Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i  `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use29MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use4MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i`* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i  `- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i    `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use23MitchAlsup1
10 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i     `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2John Levine
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      i`- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use19MitchAlsup1
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i       `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i        `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use17Lars Poulsen
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i         +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i         `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use3George Neuner
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         `- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i  `* Re: Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Aug 24 i  i i  `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1George Neuner
16 Aug 24 i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use4Lynn Wheeler
15 Aug 24 i  `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Thomas Koenig
15 Aug 24 `* Re: Article on new mainframe use7Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal