Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use
De : jgd (at) *nospam* cix.co.uk (John Dallman)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 12. Sep 2024, 22:33:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <memo.20240912223318.19028n@jgd.cix.co.uk>
References : 1
In article <20240912141925.000039f3@yahoo.com>, already5chosen@yahoo.com
(Michael S) wrote:

x86 Real mode segmentation is a hack to the address space. 80286
protected mode segmentation is something else. The only similarity
between the two is maximal size of segment is the same.

Yup. 80286 segmentation is horribly complicated as compared to real mode,
and still gives you tiny segments. The only widespread OS that used it
AFAIK was OS/2 1.x, much to its disadvantage. IBM's insistence that OS/2
run on the 286 was a world-shaping mistake.

386 mode was far more useful, and survives to the present day.

John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Aug 24 * Article on new mainframe use132Stephen Fuld
14 Aug 24 +* Re: Article on new mainframe use124MitchAlsup1
15 Aug 24 i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use123George Neuner
15 Aug 24 i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
15 Aug 24 i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use121MitchAlsup1
15 Aug 24 i  +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
15 Aug 24 i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use118Niklas Holsti
16 Aug 24 i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use117Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Aug 24 i  i +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use30John Levine
17 Aug 24 i  i i+* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Aug 24 i  i ii+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
17 Aug 24 i  i ii`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3Keith Thompson
18 Aug 24 i  i ii `* Re: coroutines in COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2John Levine
18 Aug 24 i  i ii  `- Re: coroutines in COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Aug 24 i  i i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use24OrangeFish
18 Aug 24 i  i i +- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
18 Aug 24 i  i i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use22John Dallman
18 Aug 24 i  i i  +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use14MitchAlsup1
19 Aug 24 i  i i  i+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1John Dallman
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use12Terje Mathisen
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use11Michael S
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use10Terje Mathisen
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i   `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use9Michael S
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i    +* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use6John Levine
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i+- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i`* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3MitchAlsup1
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i    i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Keith Thompson
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i    i   `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i    `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2John Dallman
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i     `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Aug 24 i  i i  `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Aug 24 i  i i   `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use6John Levine
21 Aug 24 i  i i    `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Aug 24 i  i i     `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Keith Thompson
21 Aug 24 i  i i      `* Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use3MitchAlsup1
21 Aug 24 i  i i       +- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Keith Thompson
2 Sep 24 i  i i       `- Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Tim Rentsch
16 Aug 24 i  i +* Re: Article on new mainframe use82George Neuner
22 Aug 24 i  i i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use81BGB
23 Aug 24 i  i i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
23 Aug 24 i  i i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use79Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Aug 24 i  i i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use77BGB
23 Aug 24 i  i i  i+- Re: libraries, was Article on new mainframe use1John Levine
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use75Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i +- Re: Article on new mainframe use1BGB
24 Aug 24 i  i i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use73John Levine
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i  +* Re: Article on new mainframe use70Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use69John Levine
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i  `* Re: Article on new mainframe use67Michael S
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   +* Re: Article on new mainframe use12John Levine
30 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i`* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use11John Levine
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i +* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use8Stefan Monnier
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i+* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use5Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii`* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use4Terje Mathisen
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii +* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii i`- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anssi Saari
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i ii `- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i+- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Anton Ertl
31 Aug 24 i  i i  i  i   i i`- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1George Neuner
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i `* Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i  `- Re: tiny COBOL, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   +* Re: Article on new mainframe use6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i+* Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use3John Levine
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   ii+- Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use1Lynn Wheeler
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   ii`- Re: COBOL history, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i`* Re: Article on new mainframe use2John Dallman
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   i `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i   `* Re: Article on new mainframe use48Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i    `* Re: Article on new mainframe use47MitchAlsup1
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i     `* Re: Article on new mainframe use46Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i      `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use45John Levine
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       +- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Thomas Koenig
2 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       +- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Stephen Fuld
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i       `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use42Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2Terje Mathisen
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        i`- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i        `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use39John Levine
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use37John Dallman
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i+- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i+* transparent huge pages (was: Address bits again)4Anton Ertl
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii+- Re: transparent huge pages1MitchAlsup1
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii+- Re: transparent huge pages1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         ii`- Re: transparent huge pages (was: Address bits again)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i`* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use31John Levine
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use30Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i  `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use29MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use4MitchAlsup1
8 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i`* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   i  `- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i   `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i    `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use23MitchAlsup1
10 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i     `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use2John Levine
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      i`- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i      `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use19MitchAlsup1
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i       `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i        `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use17Lars Poulsen
12 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i         +* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         i         `* Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use3George Neuner
4 Sep 24 i  i i  i  i         `- Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Aug 24 i  i i  i  `* Re: Article on new mainframe use2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Aug 24 i  i i  `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1George Neuner
16 Aug 24 i  i `* Re: Article on new mainframe use4Lynn Wheeler
15 Aug 24 i  `- Re: Article on new mainframe use1Thomas Koenig
15 Aug 24 `* Re: Article on new mainframe use7Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal