Sujet : Re: Continuations
De : johnl (at) *nospam* taugh.com (John Levine)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 16. Jul 2024, 03:03:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Taughannock Networks
Message-ID : <v74kdq$1thc$1@gal.iecc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid>:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:56:00 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>
According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:06:13 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:
>
IMO, for something to qualify as a continuation-passing call, the
caller should select the callee -- the thing to be executed next --
but in SAGE/SABRE it is the scheduler that selects what to execute
next.
>
What you have is that SAGE/SABRE has built a higher-level scheduler
abstraction on top of lower-level coroutines/continuations.
It was an event loop, not coroutines.
>
The one does not preclude the other. So they lacked the coroutine
abstraction; that could have been added easily enough in the application
implementation language.
Just for amusement, what do you think the application implementation
languages for SAGE and SABRE were? For that matter, what computers do
you think they ran on?
-- Regards,John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Continuations
Re: Continuations