Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)
De : paaronclayton (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul A. Clayton)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 31. Jul 2024, 03:45:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8c509$19dpt$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0
On 7/26/24 4:53 PM, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:27:04 +0000, EricP wrote:
[snip]>>                                                  Because if you
retain
the predictor values then the new thread has to unlearn what it learned,
before it starts to learn values for the new thread. Whereas if the
predictor is flushed it can immediately learn its own values.
 The BP only has 4-states as 2-bits, anything you initialize its state
to will take nearly as long to seed as a completely random table one
inherits from the previous process. {{BTBs are different}}
The TA in TAGE is for TAgged; TAGE-based direction preditors would
(I suspect) typically "miss" rather than mispredict. (The papers
on TAGE seem to recommend 3 bit counters; one would expect
correlations to be less strong so averaging over more encounters
seems sensible.)
One can also theoretically alter the sense of a prediction state
or the hysteresis by XORing with other data. XORing a hysteresis
bit with one bit derived from the branch address might have a
beneficial effect on interference. (Agree prediction can also
change the sense of a predictor bit. For the hysteresis bit, if
it is not used for a quick confidence estimate, the backward/
forward character of the static branch could be used to bias the
hysteresis. This might not actually be useful, but is an
obvious design possibility.) I do not know how much such would
affect retraining. Inverting the hysteresis bit sense for half
of the aliasing branches would seem to speed retraining when the
hysteresis is commonly "strongly" (half of aliases would be
interpreted as "weakly")
(Awareness of a phase change, e.g., from increase in misprediction
rate or cache miss rate, might be used to bias retraining or
perhaps bias predictor selection.)
A branch predicted as taken but lacking a BTB entry might use the
BTB miss to rebias the prediction; one would also have the time
between BTB miss determination and decode (for IP-relative
branches) to consult an overriding predictor, either fetching as
if not taken or stalling fetch to save energy.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Jul 24 * YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)15Thomas Koenig
25 Jul 24 +* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)2MitchAlsup1
4 Aug 24 i`- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1Bozo User
25 Jul 24 +* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)11Michael S
26 Jul 24 i`* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)10Anton Ertl
26 Jul 24 i +* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)5MitchAlsup1
27 Jul 24 i i+* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)2MitchAlsup1
30 Jul 24 i ii`- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1MitchAlsup1
31 Jul 24 i i`* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)2Paul A. Clayton
1 Aug 24 i i `- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1Paul A. Clayton
27 Jul 24 i +- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1Michael S
29 Jul 24 i `* Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)3Anton Ertl
29 Jul 24 i  +- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1MitchAlsup1
31 Jul 24 i  `- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1MitchAlsup1
25 Jul 24 `- Re: YASV (Yet Another Security Vulnearability)1Anton Ertl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal