Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 2:27:40 +0000, Robert Finch wrote:I think vector use is somewhat dubious, but they have some uses. In many cases data can be processed just fine without vector registers. In the current project vector instructions use the scalar functional units to compute, making them no faster than scalar calcs. But vectors have a lot of code density where parallel computation on multiple data items using a single instruction is desirable. I do not know why people use vector registers in general, but they are present in some modern architectures. Qupls vector registers are 512 bits wide (8 64-bit elements). Bigfoot’s vector registers are 1024 bits wide (8 128-bit elements).
Making the scalar register file a subset of the vector register file.Why do you think a vector register file is the way to go ??
And renaming only vector elements.
>
There are eight elements in a vector register and each element is
128-bits wide. (Corresponding to the size of a GPR). Vector register
file elements are subject to register renaming to allow the full power
of the OoO machine to be used to process vectors. The issue is that with
both the vector and scalar registers present for renaming there are a
lot of registers to rename. It is desirable to keep the number of
renamed registers (including vector elements) <= 256 total. So, the 64
scalar registers are aliased with the first eight vector registers.
Leaving only 24 truly available vector registers. Hm. There are 1024
physical registers, so maybe going up to about 300 renamable register
would not hurt.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.