Re: x86S Specification

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: x86S Specification
De : johnl (at) *nospam* taugh.com (John Levine)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 22. Oct 2024, 02:16:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Taughannock Networks
Message-ID : <vf6ucr$g6j$1@gal.iecc.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
According to MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com>:
x86's long term survival depends on things out of AMD's and Intel's
hands. It depends on high volume access to devices people will buy
new every year or every other year. A PC is not such a thing, while
a cell phone seems to be.

Intel's never going to catch up in the phone market but they're still
significant in the server and cloud market.

Think about the way that current Intel chips have a native 64 bit architecture
but can still have a 32 bit user mode that can run existing 32 bit application
binaries. So how about if the next generation is native x86S, but can also run
existing 64 bit binaries, even if not as fast as native x86S. They get the usual
cloud operating systems ported to x86S while leaving a path for people to migrate
their existing applications gradually.

--
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Oct 24 * Re: x86S Specification30BGB
22 Oct 24 +* Re: x86S Specification27MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24 i+* Re: x86S Specification12John Levine
22 Oct 24 ii+* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 iii+- Re: x86S Specification1John Dallman
23 Oct 24 iii`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii`* Re: x86S Specification8Anton Ertl
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification2John Dallman
23 Oct 24 ii i`- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 ii +* Re: x86S Specification3BGB
22 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 ii `* Re: x86S Specification2BGB
23 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: x86S Specification1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i+- Re: x86S Specification1BGB
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: x86S Specification13George Neuner
23 Oct 24 i `* Re: x86S Specification12MitchAlsup1
24 Oct 24 i  `* Re: x86S Specification11George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i   `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification10John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
25 Oct 24 i    i`- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1BGB
25 Oct 24 i    +* Re: old phones, x86S Specification4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i    i`* Re: old phones, x86S Specification3John Levine
25 Oct 24 i    i +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1John Levine
26 Oct 24 i    i `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Michael S
25 Oct 24 i    +- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1George Neuner
25 Oct 24 i    `* Re: old phones, x86S Specification2yeti
25 Oct 24 i     `- Re: old phones, x86S Specification1Robert Finch
22 Oct 24 `* Re: x86S Specification2MitchAlsup1
22 Oct 24  `- Re: x86S Specification1BGB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal