Re: Instruction Parcel Size

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Instruction Parcel Size
De : robfi680 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Robert Finch)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 09. Mar 2025, 13:36:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqk21e$npck$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Conditional Branches (compare and branch) are 48-bit
pp-R-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-aaaaaa-bbbbbb-A-ffff-ooooooo-01
 Careful choice of oooooo may allow it to contain the condition
in the ffff field expanding the displacement to 25-effective
bits.
 
Gained a bit in the displacement field by allocating another row of opcodes and moving the 'R' bit into the opcode. So, now its
pp-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-aaaaaa-bbbbbb-A-ffff-oooRooo-01
a longer form of branches could also be made using a 96-bit instruction
pp-{68{T}}-aaaaaa-bbbbbb-A-ffff-oooRooo-10
been pondering coming up with a shorter form (24-bit) branches, maybe by comparing to zero, BEQZ / BNEZ. Say,
TTTTTTTTT-aaaaaa-ooooooo-00
would be good only for word-size integer value comparisons, but that might work a significant portion of the time.
Having 20 T's gives 21.5 bits of effective displacement, as the displacement T's are multiplied by three.
Using up eight of the free opcodes, so there is only about 13 left now, but I think it was worth it to get a branch displacement bit.
Hmmm, I could get rid of the 'A' bit by moving it to a control register. One would likely want absolute addressing for branches for the entire program, not just one-at-a-time selection.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Jan 25 * Misc: Ongoing status...25BGB
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...19MitchAlsup1
31 Jan 25 i`* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...18BGB
31 Jan 25 i `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...17MitchAlsup1
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...16BGB
1 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...15MitchAlsup1
1 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...14BGB
2 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Misc: Ongoing status...13MitchAlsup1
2 Feb 25 i      +- Re: Misc: Ongoing status...1BGB
2 Feb 25 i      `* Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers (was: Misc: Ongoing status...)11Anton Ertl
2 Feb 25 i       `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers10BGB
2 Feb 25 i        `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers9BGB
3 Feb 25 i         `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers8MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25 i          `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers7BGB
3 Feb 25 i           `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers6MitchAlsup1
3 Feb 25 i            `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers5BGB
4 Feb 25 i             `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers4MitchAlsup1
4 Feb 25 i              `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers3BGB
4 Feb 25 i               `* Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers2MitchAlsup1
5 Feb 25 i                `- Re: Caller-saved vs. callee-saved registers1BGB
9 Mar 25 `* Instruction Parcel Size5Robert Finch
9 Mar 25  `* Re: Instruction Parcel Size4MitchAlsup1
9 Mar 25   +- Re: Instruction Parcel Size1Robert Finch
9 Mar 25   `* Re: Instruction Parcel Size2Robert Finch
9 Mar 25    `- Re: Instruction Parcel Size1MitchAlsup1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal