Sujet : Re: Tonight's tradeoff
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 11. Mar 2024, 17:32:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86v85sraon.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
George Neuner <
gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:29:52 -0400, George Neuner
<gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
Problem is - whatever [GC] you choose - it will be wrong and have bad
performance for some important class of GC'd applications.
>
"bad performance" may mean "slow", but also may mean memory use much
higher than should be necessary.
Understood. And there are other relevant metrics as well, as
for example not throughput but worst-case latency.
Re: Tonight's tradeoff
Re: Tonight's tradeoff