Sujet : Re: Tonight's tradeoff
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 13. Mar 2024, 04:13:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <867ci6rfgu.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
George Neuner <
gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:32:40 -0700, Tim Rentsch
<tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:
>
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:29:52 -0400, George Neuner
<gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
Problem is - whatever [GC] you choose - it will be wrong and have bad
performance for some important class of GC'd applications.
>
"bad performance" may mean "slow", but also may mean memory use much
higher than should be necessary.
>
Understood. And there are other relevant metrics as well, as
for example not throughput but worst-case latency.
>
If latency is the primary concern, then you should use a deterministic
system such as Baker's Treadmill. [...]
Does this mean you aren't going to answer my other question?
Re: Tonight's tradeoff
Re: Tonight's tradeoff