Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO
De : paaronclayton (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul A. Clayton)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 21. Mar 2024, 02:12:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utg1hi$1qkqs$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0
On 1/22/24 9:44 AM, Paul A. Clayton wrote:
[snip]
Obviously an extremely biased workload like the data analysis
workloads targeted by Intel's research chip would probably show
A55 in a better light (though A55 would likely be very inefficient
compared to the research design, I think it used 4-way threaded
in-order cores with limited cache and narrow memory channels [to avoid 64-byte accesses to access 64-bits or less of data]), but
that would not be "fair".
I (finally) found a reference to the Intel research chip.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10188866
"The Intel Programmable and Integrated Unified Memory Architecture
Graph Analytics Processor" (Sriram Aananthakrishnan et al., 2023)
A PDF of the paper appears to be available at
https://heirman.net/papers/aananthakrishnan2023piuma.pdf

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Mar 24 o Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Paul A. Clayton

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal