Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO
De : mitchalsup (at) *nospam* aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 25. Mar 2024, 19:38:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <91ae34056492b2f17927b3cff3261e30@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Scott Lurndal wrote:

"Paul A. Clayton" <paaronclayton@gmail.com> writes:
On 3/24/24 4:39 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:

There is a significant demand for performance monitoring.   Note
that in addition to to standard performance monitoring registers,
AArch64 also (optionally) supports statistical profiling and
out-of-band instruction tracing (ETF).   The demand from users
is such that all those features are present in most designs.
My 66000 Architecture defines 8 performance counters at each layer of the design:: cores gets 8 counters, L1s gets 8 counters, L3s gets 8 counters Interconnect gets 8 counters, Memory Controller gets 8 counters, PCIe root gets 8 counters--and every instance multiplies the counters. All counters are available via MMI/O space, and can be copied out or reinitialized in a single LDM, STM, or MM instruction. Any thread with
a TLB mapping can read or write based on permission bits.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 24 * Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO15Paul A. Clayton
24 Mar 24 `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO14MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24  `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO13Paul A. Clayton
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24   `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO10Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24    +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1BGB
25 Mar 24    +* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO6John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i+- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i`* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO4Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i `* Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)3Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i  +- Re: Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)1John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i  `- Re: Performance monitoring1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24    `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO2Terje Mathisen
26 Mar 24     `- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Terje Mathisen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal