Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO
De : anton (at) *nospam* mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 26. Mar 2024, 11:27:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID : <2024Mar26.102754@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : xrn 10.11
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
The biggest demand is from the OS vendors.    Hardware folks have
simulation and emulators.

You don't want to use a full-blown microarchitectural emulator for a
long-running program.

Look at vtune, for example.

And?

- anton
--
'Anyone trying for "industrial quality" ISA should avoid undefined behavior.'
  Mitch Alsup, <c17fcd89-f024-40e7-a594-88a85ac10d20o@googlegroups.com>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 24 * Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO15Paul A. Clayton
24 Mar 24 `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO14MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24  `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO13Paul A. Clayton
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24   +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24   `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO10Anton Ertl
25 Mar 24    +- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1BGB
25 Mar 24    +* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO6John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i+- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i`* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO4Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i `* Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)3Anton Ertl
26 Mar 24    i  +- Re: Performance monitoring (was: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO)1John Dallman
26 Mar 24    i  `- Re: Performance monitoring1MitchAlsup1
25 Mar 24    `* Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO2Terje Mathisen
26 Mar 24     `- Re: Efficiency of in-order vs. OoO1Terje Mathisen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal