Sujet : Re: "Mini" tags to reduce the number of op codes
De : quadibloc (at) *nospam* servername.invalid (John Savard)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 17. Apr 2024, 22:07:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <6ee02jlul3rameturqm8ss87ht2aq54k3u@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:56:27 +0000,
mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
wrote:
So, instead of using the branch target address, one rounds it down to
a 256-bit boundary, reads 256-bits and looks at the first 4-bits to
determine the format, nd then uses the branch offset to pick a cont-
tainer which will become the first instruction executed.
>
Sounds more complicated than necessary.
Yes, I don't disagree. I'm just pointing out that it's possible to
make the mini tags idea work that way, since it lets you easily turn
mini tags off when you need to.
John Savard