Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
On Wed, 8 May 2024 21:46:37 +0000, mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
wrote:
So, why do you need a header AT ALL !!
Assuming I don't want to ever allow the circuits of my computer to try
decoding an instruction that turns out later to be data (unless the
programmer has made an error, in which case the penalty of the program
being aborted is no problem)...
and I want the computer to be able to decode all the instructions in aWhat makes you think My 66000 ISA cannot be decoded in parallel ??
block in parallel, as a way to improve performance,
then I need a block header to say 'here are the instructions toSeems like a horrible plan going forward with your goals in mind.
decode' IF I don't want to be absolutely limited to all instructions
having the same length.
While I could still have a pair of 16-bit instructions in a 32-bit
word, without headers I couldn't have immediates (at least not of most
lengths), or other instructions longer than 32 bits.
And headers let me add instruction predication, which is also good, asI added predication without any such need.
branches do cause difficulties which predication partly avoids.
(There's still a dependency on what is being predicated upon.)
The header facilitates fast decoding of a flexible instruction set,The header allows subtracting 1 stage from the 12+ stage k-wide pipeline,
and allows VLIW features allowing the ISA to be used for embedded
processors.
John Savard
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.