Re: Unicode in strings

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c arch 
Sujet : Re: Unicode in strings
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.arch
Date : 03. Jun 2024, 09:06:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3jth8$3qduu$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Fri, 31 May 2024 12:14:19 -0500, BGB wrote:

Though, one thing that makes sense for text editors is if only the
"currently being edited" lines are fully unpacked, whereas the others
can remain in a more compact form (such as UTF-8), and are then unpacked
as they come into view (say, treating the editor window as a 32-entry
modulo cache or similar).

That may make sense if you are implementing a *text* editor, like the vi/
vim family. Remember that Emacs is usable for editing things other than
text.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 24 * Re: Unicode in strings11BGB
31 May 24 +* Re: Unicode in strings6MitchAlsup1
31 May 24 i`* Re: Unicode in strings5BGB
31 May 24 i +* Re: Unicode in strings2MitchAlsup1
31 May 24 i i`- Re: Unicode in strings1BGB
3 Jun 24 i `* Re: Unicode in strings2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Unicode in strings1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Unicode in strings2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 24 i`- Re: Unicode in strings1BGB
4 Jun 24 `* Re: Unicode in strings2Stefan Monnier
5 Jun 24  `- Re: Unicode in strings1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal