Sujet : Re: Concertlina II: Full Circle
De : quadibloc (at) *nospam* servername.invalid (John Savard)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 20. Jun 2024, 05:04:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <sea77jhf22ksv44sfk9bp4o3irs066s6j2@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:23:57 +0000,
mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
wrote:
John Savard wrote:
>
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:54:04 +0000, mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
wrote:
>
The semantics of instructions in a loop are subtly altered such
that they can be vectorized and to execute multi-lane style.
>
I've decided that I will not be able to use the one from the original
Concertina, and will need to design a VVM-like instruction for
Concertina II from scratch.
>
Unlike yours, it won't be...subtle.
>
LOL
I wrote that before I learned you had explicit opt-out bits in your
VVM instruction.
Also, I've checked. There's nothing resembling VVM in my original
Concertina design, as I had mistakenly thought.
John Savard