Re: ancient OS history, ARM is sort of channeling the IBM 360

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:22:04 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>

... more often than not locate I/O is faster and easier.

>
Given all the caveats and restrictions, “easier” is not how I would
describe it.
>
But perhaps we’re talking at cross-purposes. If Mitch did his TSS and
PL/I
stuff in the 1970s, while you’re talking about the 1960s, then that
could
explain it. By the 1970s, CPU/RAM speeds had improved to the point where
copying records a few hundred bytes at a time between buffers was not
the
performance bottleneck; disk I/O was.

When you touched the address, the page fault caused the I/O.

>
There seems to be this assumption that the paging mechanism is some kind
of clever way of doing I/O. It’s not.