Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c arch |
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:43:44 +0300, Niklas HolstiThe largest a team should be is 11 + leader--Jesus tried for 12 and
<niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote:On 2024-07-22 3:05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 22:21:41 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:>
>IBM CEO said something to the effect:: How can a team of 24 people,>
including the janitor, beat IBM ??
From Watsons memo:
>
Last week Control Data had a press conference during which they
officially announced their 6600 system. I understand that in the
laboratory developing this system there are only 34 people,
including the janitor. Of these, 14 are engineers and 4 are
programmers, and only one person has a Ph.D., a relatively junior
programmer. Contrasting this modest effort with our own vast
development activities, I fail to understand why we have lost our
industry leadership position by letting someone else offer the
worlds most powerful computer.
Per Wikipedia, Cray's reply was sardonic: "It seems like Mr. Watson has
answered his own question."
While IBM did not appear to understand the wisdom in Cray's remark at
the time - that a large organization can have internal politics and
communications overhead and other things that hamper innovation - it
did _eventually_ learn its lesson.
>
So when it came time for IBM to make its mark in the new, emerging
field of microcomputers, it had a small team, working in isolation
from the rest of IBM, go and design the IBM Personal Computer in all
its 4.77 MHz 8088 glory.
>
John Savard
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.