Sujet : Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600
De : mitchalsup (at) *nospam* aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Groupes : comp.archDate : 31. Jul 2024, 15:48:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <42b718a67a504401e897274c1fd3ca3b@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 7:40:55 +0000, Michael S wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:51:39 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:04:59 +0300, Michael S wrote:
>
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:10:05 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
That would be equivalent to a 100-wide in-order processor, would it
not?
>
It would not.
>
Why not?
>
How many instructions in flight are there on 1-wide in-order MIPS
R3000?
4 int or Mem up to 6 FP
How many on 1-wide in-order MIPS R4000?
6 Int or Mem up to 9 FP
Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600
Re: Stealing a Great Idea from the 6600